Re: Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The role of radiotherapy in the palliation of painful symptomatic bone metastases is well established. Recently, it has been reported that single-fraction radiotherapy is as effective as multifraction radiotherapy ( 1 , 2 ) , which is the most widely used regimen. We read the interest the article by Hartsell et al. ( 3 ) , which compared the ability of a single 8-Gy fraction of radiation therapy with that of 30 Gy delivered in 10 treatment fractions to palliate pain from bone metastasis. We conducted a similar trial in our hospital from July 15, 1999, to December 31, 2001, in which we enrolled a total of 160 patients and randomly assigned them to receive either a single fraction of 8 Gy of radiation therapy or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The pain intensity was measured on a patient-assessed ordinal pain scale of 0 – 10. A partial response was defi ned as a pain reduction of two points or more on this scale, without the increased use of analgesic drugs. A complete response was defi ned as a pain score of zero at the treated area without increased use of analgesic drugs. Patient follow-up was at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after the onset of treatment. The two groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, primary tumor type, localization of metastases, or analgesic drug consumption. There were no differences in survival rates between the two arms. The overall response rates were 75.5% in the 8-Gy arm and 86.6% in the 30-Gy arm (difference = 11.1%, 95% confi dence interval [CI] = − 2.4% to 24.2%). Complete response rates were 15.4% in the 8-Gy arm and 13.4% in the 30-Gy arm (difference = 2.0%, 95% CI = − 14.1% to 10.2 %). None of these differences were statistically signifi cant. Our acute toxicity outcomes were similar to those reported by Hartsell et al. Toxicity was higher in our 30-Gy arm (18.2%) than in our 8-Gy arm (12.7%), but these differences were not statistically signifi cant (difference = 5.5%, 95% CI = − 7.0% to 17.9%). In addition, as in Hartsell et al., the retreatment rate in our trial was statistically signifi cantly higher in the 8-Gy arm than in the 30-Gy arm (28.2% versus 2.4%) (difference = 25.8%, 95% CI = − 37.5% to − 14.0%) ( Table 1 ). Hartsell et al. reported that one of the main limitations of their study was the trial included only patients with metastases from breast or prostate cancer. We enrolled all the patients with a life expectancy of longer than 1 month, regardless of the location of their metastases or their primary cancer. We did not fi nd statistically signifi cant differences between treatment arms, except for patients with lung cancer metastases. In these patients, the response was statistically signifi cantly higher in the 30-Gy arm than in the 8-Gy arm for the crude response rates (90.9% versus 57.9%) (difference = 33%, 95% CI = 2.9% to 63.2%), but these differences disappeared in the actuarial rate of response. We concluded that the regimen of a single fraction of 8 Gy was as safe and effective as a multifraction regimen for the palliation of painful bone metastases. The 8-Gy single fraction was the treatment of choice for most of the patients, except for patients with the lung cancer metastases, for whom additional studies are required.
منابع مشابه
Dosimetric analysis for the selection of radionuclides in bone pain palliation targeted therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation
Introduction:The use of beta emitters is one of the effective methods for palliation of bone metastasis. The risk of normal tissue toxicity should be evaluated in the bone pain palliation treatment. Methods: In this study, the Monte Carlo simulation code MCNPX was used for simulation a bone phantom model consisted of bone marrow, bone and soft tissue. Spe...
متن کاملTreatment efficacy of 153Sm-EDTMP for painful bone metastasis
Introduction: Involvement of the skeleton can cause an excruciating pain in two-thirds of terminal patients with a history of malignancy. Due to several limitations of other therapies, such as analgesics, bisphosphonates, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and external beam radiotherapy; bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have an important role in palliation of pain from bone metastases. Although th...
متن کاملRandomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases.
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy is effective in palliating pain from bone metastases. We investigated whether 8 Gy delivered in a single treatment fraction provides pain and narcotic relief that is equivalent to that of the standard treatment course of 30 Gy delivered in 10 treatment fractions over 2 weeks. METHODS A prospective, phase III randomized study of palliative radiation therapy was con...
متن کاملEffectiveness and complications of 188Re-HEDP in palliative treatment of diffuse skeletal metastases
Introduction: Bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer-related pain in various primary malignant tumors, most often, breast and prostate. 188Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (188Re-HEDP) is a new and less expensive bone seeking radiopharmaceutical with favorable physical characteristics of the radionuclide such as short half life of 16.9h, maximal β energy of ...
متن کاملEvaluation of Strontium-89 in palliative treatment of widespread and painful bone metastases due to breast and prostate cancer [Persian]
Treatment of bone metastases comprises over 10% of the workload of a radiation-oncology center. Bone metastases produce severe pain and immobility, necessitate narcotic use, and reduce the quality of life. A good palliative treatment must be complete, free from side effects and fast; Thus we decided to evaluate Strontium-89 (89Sr) effectivity for palliation of breast and prostate cancer b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
دوره 98 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006